The UK has had notable success in driving gender parity in the boardroom using an entirely voluntary approach, in line with its “Comply or Explain” approach to corporate governance. The Hampton-Alexander Review (later FTSE Women Leaders) was successful in moving women board participation from 12% in 2010 to the current level, helped by both shareholder and media scrutiny. However, there has been more progress at non-executive than at executive level.
Now, to enable meaningful change within senior leadership ranks, we first need to understand how women’s representation is—or is not—changing within specific executive functions across the UK’s largest companies. Understanding these nuances helps us move past gender diversity generalizations toward a more substantive analysis of the career trajectories of those with decision-making power and influence. To do this, Russell Reynolds Associates analyzed the C-suites of the top 100 organizations in the FTSE, learning that:
Learn more about RRA Artemis, our exclusive development program designed to accelerate women leaders from the world’s most influential organizations into the CEO seat.
|
The world needs more women leaders. Research shows that firms with more women in senior positions are more profitable, more socially responsible, and provide safer, higher-quality customer experiences. And RRA’s own research shows that women leaders perform alongside (or, on coaching & development measures, even outperform) their male counterparts. And while change is happening, this data shows that it’s not happening fast—or consistently—enough.
There are 61% fewer women executives in leadership teams than there are in the UK population (Figure 1). While women account for 51% of the UK population benchmark, they account for just 32% of all executives in the top leadership teams of the FTSE 100. Comparably, men account for 68% of the executives in those top leadership teams.
Figure 1: Men and women’s representations in the FTSE 100 (2024)
Source: RRA Proprietary Analysis, FTSE100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=97 companies, 992 executives); Population benchmark from Statista UK population by gender 2022 | Statista. Data on executive teams was pulled from Boardex in August 2024 and was categorized and analyzed in September 2024.
With women holding only 9% of the FTSE 100 CEO roles, there needs to be 5.6x the number of women CEOs to be at parity with the UK’s population benchmark.
What’s more, the traditional CEO feeder roles of P&L leaders, CFOs, and COOs also show significant underrepresentation of women, making the path toward CEO that much harder (Figure 2).
Within P&L leadership positions, where women make up only 21% of executives, we need to see 2.4x more women appointed to reach parity. Additionally, 28% of executives in the COO role are women, and 25% in the CFO role are women, meaning we would need to double the proportion of women in these roles to reach parity with the population benchmark.
Figure 2: FTSE 100 gender distribution by executive roles (2024)
Source: RRA Proprietary Analysis, FTSE100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=97 companies, 992 executives); Population benchmark from Statista UK population by gender 2022 | Statista. Data on executive teams was pulled from Boardex in August 2024 and was categorized and analyzed in September 2024.
That said, women in the FTSE 100 are experiencing better representation in some of these roles than their S&P counterparts. While women hold 9% of the CEO roles in both the FTSE and S&P 100, women CFOs are more common in the UK, as women hold 25% of these roles in the FTSE 100, versus 20% in the S&P 100. Given CFOs serve alongside CEOs on the main board of FTSE 100 companies, this is also helpful in increasing the pool of potential women CEOs.
Finally, there are also significantly more women COOs in the FTSE 100 than the S&P 100—28% vs 8%, respectively.
Figure 3: Share of FTSE 100 vs S&P 100 women leaders in CEO & CEO feeder roles
Source: RRA Proprietary Analysis, FTSE100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=97 companies, 992 executives); S&P 100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=100 companies, 1553 executives)
Analysis from our CEO Turnover Index shows that, for the 94 CEO appointments in the FTSE100 between Q1 2018 and Q3 2024, 41% came from directly from divisional or regional P&L leadership roles. Another 16% had been a CFO immediately prior, and 17% held other CEO roles. This underscores the importance of improving women’s representation within these roles, as they are most likely to lead to the CEO job.
Interestingly, the COO role is a less common feeder for the CEO position in the FTSE100, accounting for 9% of FTSE appointments (vs 35% in the US’ S&P 500 appointments). So while the stronger women representation in the COO role in the FTSE100 is encouraging, it may have limited impact on the overall number of women being appointed CEO.
FTSE 100 women are far better represented than S&P 100 women in strategy roles than their US peers, holding 36% of the index’s strategy leadership roles, compared to women in the S&P 100 holding only 22% of these positions (Figure 4).
FTSE women are also nearly twice as likely to hold product, engineering, and science roles than women in the S&P 100 (39% vs 20%). However, given that there are far fewer of these roles in FTSE 100 top leadership teams, this does little to further overall gender parity for women in the UK.
Figure 4: Share of FTSE 100 vs S&P 100 women leaders in product, engineering, and strategy roles
Source: RRA Proprietary Analysis, FTSE100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=97 companies, 992 executives); S&P 100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=100 companies, 1553 executives)
Hetty Pye
Russell Reynolds Associates, Co-founder of RRA Artemis
While it’s important to understand gender representation across the FTSE 100’s executive population, it’s perhaps even more crucial to understand how it varies between companies. With that, we analyzed each FTSE 100 leadership team, only including organizations with five or more executives in the C-suite (90 in total.)
As of August 2024, one FTSE 100 senior leadership team is comprised of all men, and 12 have only one woman executive onboard (Figure 5). Twenty-five C-suites have less than 25% women, and 42 are comprised of less than one-third women.
Only 12 FTSE 100 leadership teams are comprised of 50% or more women. While this is better than the S&P’s six leadership teams at gender parity, it still showcases how much work the FTSE still has to do to reach an equitable leadership threshold.
Of those 12 organizations, women lead three of them and hold half of their CEO feeder roles. Beyond that, the companies all look different from an industry, product, and years of existence perspective. This shows that parity does not rely on how an organization defines itself; it’s a function of demonstrated commitment to meaningful diversity at the top.
Figure 5: FTSE 100 leadership team gender diversity snapshot
Source: RRA Proprietary Analysis, FTSE100 Leadership Teams, 2024 (n=90 companies). Population benchmark from Statista UK population by gender 2022 | Statista. Data on executive teams was pulled from Boardex in August 2024 and was categorized and analyzed in September 2024.
With women holding only 9% of CEO positions in the FTSE 100 and only 21% of the most common CEO feeder role (P&L leadership), the FTSE 100’s gender imbalances risk getting stuck in a self-perpetuating cycle.
Given that women executives remain significantly underrepresented in traditional CEO feeder roles, our findings highlight two imperatives:
Gender diversity in executive leadership means more than just equal representation of men and women across C-suites. Organizations must also ensure that women brought into executive leadership roles also gain a sense of belonging and see the direct impacts of their contributions to the organization’s success.
RRA is firmly committed to elevating more women to the top job. That’s why we launched Artemis, our program designed to accelerate the development of women from the world’s most influential organizations into the CEO seat. By expediting the progress of more women to the helm as CEOs, we can collectively unlock untapped talent, co-create new CEO leadership models, and build a strong network of like-minded peers and allies who will support each other throughout their careers.
Laura Sanderson
Russell Reynolds Associates
Leah Christianson is a member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Center for Leadership Insight. She is based in San Francisco.
Tom Handcock leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Center for Leadership Insight. He is based in London.
Margot McShane co-leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Board & CEO Advisory practice in the Americas, and is the co-founder of RRA Artemis. She is based in San Francisco.
Hetty Pye is a senior member of Russell Reynolds Associates’ Board & CEO Advisory practice, and is the co-founder of RRA Artemis. She is based in London.
Laura Sanderson co-leads Russell Reynolds Associates’ Board & CEO Advisory practice in Europe, and co-leads the firm’s operations in Europe, Middle East and India. She is based in London.
For our analysis, we examined the top leadership teams—as stated by the companies themselves—of the 100 largest organizations within the FTSE. We compared the composition of those teams with the UK population by gender from the UK Labour Market Statistics. The size and nature of top leadership teams varies across organizations, ranging from 10.2 executives on average, to 24 executives on the largest team and just 2 executives on the smallest team. A company’s disclosure of whom it chooses to state as part of its top leadership team is not only a factor of organizational structure, but also an indicator as to whom the company values and where power and responsibility reside.
We analyzed 97 of the largest companies in the FTSE (what we refer to as the “FTSE 100”). Three of the top 100 FTSE organizations are defined as investment trusts, and were therefore excluded from this analysis. These 97 companies encompassed 992 executives on their leadership teams, which were identified using Boardex (a people intelligence data provider) and each company’s own website.
Gender data comes directly from Boardex. Due to the sensitivity and complexity of this data, no data is reported on individuals and all data is analyzed and reported in the aggregate.
Our data sources (Boardex and company websites) provide information on each executive's job title and responsibilities. However, there is a high degree of variability in that information, which is both a facet of differences in specific job titles for common functional roles and differences in organizational structures and between industries.
We designed a role categorization process whereby each executive was tagged to a specific role. In some instances, only one executive in each company could be tagged to the role, while in other instances multiple individuals could be tagged to the same role category. See the table below for more details.
Roles | Details |
---|---|
CEO |
Multiple allowed to account for co-CEOs |
CFO, CHRO, CMO, COO, GC, COO |
Only one person per company listed (if role exists). |
CIO/CTO |
Multiple allowed in specific cases where there is a clear separation between Corporate IT (CIO) and Technology roles. |
Strategy |
Multiple allowed. Category includes Corporate Development. R&D and Innovation roles categorized in Product/Engineering (see below) |
Commercial |
Multiple allowed. Category includes merchandizing, and Customer roles (unless they have a very clear product/engineering orientation) |
Other Functional Leadership |
Any functional roles not caught in the above buckets. These are often sub-function roles (e.g. Treasury which is part of Finance) or roles that are just less common at this level e.g. Comms, Corporate Affairs. |
Operations/Supply Chain/Logistics |
Multiple allowed. Category covers supply chain roles, logistics, and operations role in banks and retail organizations etc. |
Product/Engineering/Science |
This category covers any roles that clearly relate to the development/creation of the product itself. Quality roles belong here as do innovation and R&D roles. In healthcare Chief Medical Officer roles live here too. |
P&L Leaders |
Individuals that run business units, regions or lines of business. |
*This article was amended on 19th November, adjusting the percentage of CEOs that are female from 11% and 9% to reflect a recent leadership change in one business and the acquisition of another business.