Most organizations spend a significant amount of time thinking about how to transform their operations, processes, technology and structures. And for good reason. Today, incremental improvement is no longer enough: Transformation is necessary to remain competitive. The pace of change has quickened and organizations must continually transform themselves instead of taking it on only occasionally. At the same time, consumers have higher expectations and less patience; there is no room for error.
In operational transformation, organizations see the promise of generating new value, unlocking hidden opportunities for growth and cost savings, and delivering a more efficient product or service. Yet for how important operational transformation can be, many organizations struggle to do it effectively. In fact, a 2015 study found that only 26 percent of organizational transformations had been very or completely successful at both improving performance and equipping the organization to sustain improvements over time.
Why? One of the big gaps is leadership. We find that, as much time as organizations spend thinking about transformation initiatives themselves, they often spend significantly less time thinking about the people who will drive these changes. They put the cart before the horse. Yet the person leading the change matters just as much or more than the many other aspects of the transformation that organizations plan extensively.
To help change that, Russell Reynolds Associates researched dozens of successful transformations and surveyed thousands of executives to find what makes a transformational operations or supply chain leader successful. First, they should have a good grasp of technology and cross-functional and global experience. Second, they should have the kind of personality and leadership style that will let them adapt to changes quickly and effectively: They should be decisive yet get input from others, be able to take calculated risks and be able to build bridges across the organization.
We looked into 50 consumer and industrial companies of $20 billion or more in revenue, with multiple manufacturing sites and a global presence. Each company had recently undertaken a significant manufacturing or other operational transformation, including supply chain synchronization, M&A restructuring and technology digitization (Exhibit 1).
The types of transformations we observed ran the gamut. Some organizations, such as Procter & Gamble, focused on integration initiatives or built centers of supply chain excellence founded on new digital initiatives. Other organizations focused on restructuring their operational setup, such as Kraft Heinz. And others introduced a data- driven, digital approach to organizing their manufacturing and supply chain processes, like GE with its Brilliant Manufacturing software.
We observed just as much variance in the intensity of transformation (Exhibit 2). Even here, we see the influence of the ever-accelerating pace of change. Noticeably, many transformation or excellence initiatives that once took five or six years to complete are now being implemented in a year or less. That means transformation leaders need to manage a significant amount of information, compressed timeframes and countless decisions that affect nearly all aspects of strategy and operations.
From the 50 companies we studied, we found that leaders who have successfully driven operational transformations typically come from one of three backgrounds.
Even leaders with the right skills and background may not have what it takes to shepherd an organization through a given transformation. The likelihood of success depends not just on the tools at the leader’s disposal, but how he or she uses them—the intangible characteristics of personality and leadership style mixed with the unique challenges of the transformation at hand.
As organizational complexity and consumer demands increase, the paradigms upon which a leader used to draw to make sense of a situation and make decisions may no longer be valid. A traditional approach may lead straight to a crisis rather than improvement. Indeed, some traits that enable a leader to run smooth and efficient day-to-day operations are different from—and, at times, in sharp contrast to—those that predict their performance as a transformational leader. The complexities and transformation mandates facing C-suite roles require future leaders who break the traditional “either/or” tradeoffs many rely on to prescribe success profiles.
Russell Reynolds Associates and Hogan have partnered to analyze the psychometric data of millions of people, including more than 8,000 C-suite leaders, to develop a better way to predict executive success. We found a single dominant pattern: Executives who perform most consistently regardless of the challenges they face are not defined by skills in static competencies but rather those that span what initially seem like competing competencies (Exhibit 3).
The fast-paced and uncertain environment typical of transforming organizations only exacerbates the need for a leader who can adjust his or her capabilities to a specific context, both technical and cultural.
Core leadership skills are crucial for leadership success at any level. But when leaders reach the C-suite, they need advanced and sophisticated pairs of seemingly competing competencies to be successful. The most effective C-suite leaders with the greatest potential to lead transformational change can actively span across the following characteristics:
As these traits show, successful transformational operations leaders must be able to think strategically about the future while simultaneously running day-to-day operations. They should have a clear vision for how operations will look going forward and how digitization, IoT and automation will disrupt the organization’s current setup. At the same time, they must be pragmatic in implementing changes while increasing customer service levels and avoiding interrupting the flow of goods or services to customers. They will take calculated risks, find opportunities in a complex environment and make sure to support action with data and avoid threats of supply chain disruptions. They will be able to communicate their vision to the board and CEO while collaborating with management and people at all levels to make transformation happen.
While the demands on a transformational leader are certainly immense, many operations leaders are uniquely suited to meet them. In fact, many operations leaders already are more likely to have these traits versus the average executive. And that was even more true for a subset of transformational leaders that recently led innovative, often digital, projects at their companies—we’ll call them digital innovators.
A recent Russell Reynolds Associates survey of more than 1,000 executives across functions, levels and companies found that chief operations executives and digital innovators were more likely to have key transformational leadership traits as compared to other executives (Exhibit 4).
As the above chart shows, operations executives and digital innovators are more innovative and bold than other executives—both essential qualities to achieving operational transformation.
However, there are a few areas in which operational leaders have some catching up to do with digital innovators with a proven record of transformational success. For example, digital innovators are much more likely to think outside the box, use less traditional approaches and be able to cut through red tape. Developing these characteristics will help operational leaders have the best chance of leading a successful transformation.
As this data shows, there are clear differences between the types of leaders who are ready to lead transformational change and those who may have more trouble getting the organization to shift successfully. Leaders who can be decisive yet seek input from others, know when to take the right risks and create effective connections across the organization will be invaluable in shepherding in new processes, technologies or structures. It’s also important that they have a solid understanding of technology and cross-functional and international experience. With so much at stake, organizations should spend as much time thinking about who will lead their next transformation as they do planning for the transformation itself.